Congress is taking another crack at data privacy legislation
Engine releases report on how determining user age impacts startups
Content Moderation Debate Needs Startup Voice
TLDR: A key House panel is holding a hearing this Thursday with the CEOs of Facebook, Google, and Twitter to examine the spread of extremism and misinformation online. It’s critical that policymakers concerned about the proliferation of harmful content across the Internet understand how potential legislative remedies would impact startups and other Internet companies’ ability to moderate user-generated content.
States Push Unworkable, Likely Unconstitutional Content Moderation Bills
TLDR: Across the country, state legislators are pushing bills that would make it harder for Internet companies to moderate content on their sites and services. In addition to raising constitutional and legal problems, the state-level push to limit moderation would disproportionately harm small and emerging companies that are attempting to compete in the Internet ecosystem.
Startup News Digest 02/05/21
The Big Story: States pushing social media laws based on unfounded bias claims. Republican state policymakers across the country are pushing for laws that would stop social media companies from engaging in content moderation, amplifying GOP politicians’ long-standing complaints about anti-conservative bias, which were refuted in a recent report. But while Republicans have directed their ire at large Internet companies and Section 230—a bedrock Internet law that allows companies of all sizes to host and moderate user content without being held liable for the content they moderate or for what their users post—their state-level efforts to ban moderation are legally problematic and would hurt small and new companies attempting to compete in the Internet ecosystem.
Startup News Digest 01/08/21
The Big Story: After attack on U.S. Capitol, Internet companies move to block Trump. Content moderation efforts at the world’s largest Internet companies were under the microscope this week as Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube took action against content shared by outgoing President Donald Trump that led to a violent riot at the Capitol that left five dead, including a U.S. Capitol Police officer.
Startup Policy: 2020 Year in Review
TLDR: Over the course of 2020, policymakers engaged on a variety of critical issues and concerns impacting the nation’s startup community, especially around the COVID-19 pandemic, which upended daily life for millions of Americans. Small businesses and entrepreneurs affected by the pandemic called for Congress to provide nascent companies with the emergency support needed to weather the economic uncertainty. The startup perspective has also been crucial in discussions about the importance of Section 230 for small Internet companies that host user-generated content, changes to a law that provides startups with a balanced framework for addressing allegations of online copyright infringement, policies limiting access to high-skilled talent, and much more. As the end of the year draws near, we wanted to highlight just a few of the policy issues that have affected the startup community in 2020.
Startup News Digest 12/18/20
The Big Story: Trump tees up NDAA veto fight over Section 230. President Donald Trump is still threatening to veto the must-pass annual defense authorization bill over his demand to repeal Section 230. Trump and some Republican lawmakers have spent months falsely claiming that the bedrock Internet law allows technology companies to “censor” conservative voices online, despite the fact that changes to the law would likely have an outsized impact on startups and others that rely on Section 230’s liability limitations to host and moderate user content.
Last Minute Moves on Section 230 Would Be Selling Out Startups
TLDR: As the year winds down, Republican policymakers are making multiple eleventh-hour attempts to undermine a foundational Internet law that has drawn the ire of President Donald Trump in the lead up to and aftermath of the 2020 election. This week, the Senate Judiciary Committee is slated to consider a bill to reform Section 230—the law that creates intermediary liability limitations for online services that host user-generated content—and the Trump administration is reportedly threatening to veto the annual defense authorization bill if it does not include Section 230 reforms.
Despite Big Tech Focus, Startups Stand to Lose in 230 Debate
TLDR: A Senate panel is holding a hearing this morning with the CEOs of Facebook and Twitter to discuss Section 230 and allegations of political bias in the context of the 2020 presidential election. Although policymakers are continuing to scrutinize Section 230 because of supposed censorship by the largest tech companies, any changes to the law would have an outsized impact on U.S. startups that rely on the bedrock Internet law in order to host and moderate user content without the fear of potentially crippling lawsuits.
Startup News Digest 11/06/20
The Big Story: Online platforms in the spotlight over election claims. With temperatures running high over the election, Internet companies have found themselves again in the spotlight for their content moderation decisions, especially amid premature claims of victory and unsubstantiated claims about voter fraud.
Startup News Digest 10/30/20
The Big Story: Where Trump and Biden stand on tech policy. With the election in full swing, President Donald Trump and Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden are wrapping up their respective campaigns. Ahead of the impending election, we wanted to take a look at where the major party candidates stand on some critical tech and startup issues.
Startups, Not Big Tech, Benefit the Most from Section 230
TLDR: A Senate panel is preparing to hold a hearing tomorrow with the CEOs of Facebook, Google, and Twitter to discuss Section 230 and allegations of political bias by big tech firms. Although Section 230 has drawn scrutiny from policymakers because of the actions of large Internet companies, the law allows platforms of all sizes to host user content and engage in content moderation without the fear of potentially crippling lawsuits. Any changes to the law will have an outsized impact on the U.S. startup ecosystem.
Startup News Digest 10/16/20
The Big Story: Spotlight on content moderation ahead of election. With the presidential election weeks away, and Americans increasingly relying on Internet services amid the ongoing coronavirus pandemic, digital platforms are working overtime to identify and moderate user-generated content that could cause real-world problems. But policymakers are turning up the heat on the already difficult and contentious issue of content moderation, with platforms’ efforts to combat the spread of conspiracy theories and misinformation leading to partisan pushback and claims of supposed censorship.
As Congress Politicizes Section 230, Startup Concerns Get Left Out
TLDR: Many members of Congress are calling for changes to Section 230—a bedrock Internet law that allows Internet platforms to host and moderate user content without having to worry about ruinous lawsuits. But Democrats and Republicans see very different problems with Section 230 and Internet platforms' content moderation practices, and most policymakers’ criticisms focus exclusively on a handful of large companies while ignoring the outsized impact that changes to Section 230 would have on startups.
Senate Considering Flawed Copyright, Section 230 Bill That Would Hurt Startups and Their Users
This year has been difficult for every individual and company in the country. During a global pandemic, which has caused widespread economic damage and uncertainty, startups are struggling—struggling to find funding, struggling to navigate existing government relief programs, and struggling to maintain jobs and operations (let alone sustain growth). And across the country, people are looking to Washington for support and guidance.
Startup News Digest 09/04/20
The Big Story: FCC review of Section 230 draws hundreds of comments. The Federal Communications Commission this week received hundreds of public comments in response to a petition from the Trump administration that asks the FCC to rewrite existing law in order to expose Internet companies that host and moderate user-generated content to new legal liability for user posts. Engine submitted comments explaining that the proposed changes are based on unsupported claims and would actually harm innovation and competition in the Internet ecosystem by making it more risky and costly to host and moderate user-generated content.
The Importance of Strong Liability Limitations for Startups
Trump Administration Ramps Up Pressure on Section 230
TLDR: The Trump administration is pressuring federal agencies to comply with an executive order that would change a bedrock Internet law in order to address supposed bias from major Internet platforms. President Donald Trump has been pushing agency officials in recent months to weaken the framework—known as Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act—that lets companies host and moderate users’ content without the fear of being sued into bankruptcy. While much of the attention around Section 230 focuses on major Internet companies, the law is especially critical for startups, which would be disproportionately impacted by policy changes in this space.
Startup News Digest 08/07/20
The Big Story: FCC takes next step on Trump’s social media executive order. A federal agency this week moved ahead with a petition from the Trump administration that could open up liability for companies that host user content. Federal Communications Commission Chairman Ajit Pai said on Monday that the agency will receive public comments in response to President Donald Trump’s May executive order on “preventing online censorship” that pushes federal agencies to clarify the meaning of “good faith” content moderation under the law.
